Independent Review and Assessment of the Green Climate Fund (GCF) Readiness 1.0 Programme Portfolio

12/2020 – 06/2021

PROJECT COORDINATOR

Guido Fernández de Velasco

TECHNICAL LEAD

Alejandro Moreno

TEAM

Anisorc Brito
Laura Abram Alberdi
Marco Antonio Ortega
Soledad Moreiras
María Lucía Guastoni

Strategic Planning

Climate Finance

Photo: Halacious for Unsplash

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) needs to assess its current portfolio of readiness grants for performance and progress in terms of delivery of results, develop an action plan to address identified challenges and gaps, and support the Secretariat to implement select/priority identified challenges as well as systematically capture common characteristics for grants under implementation. AAE will undertake a concise and thorough technical assessment of the Secretariat’s current portfolio of approved readiness grants under implementation and develop a set of measurable, specific recommendations for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of how these grants are managed.

Main tasks

  • Assess the readiness portfolio under implementation for performance and delivery of results in order to assess the extent to which the Readiness Programme portfolio are fulfilling the intended objectives;
  • Assess trends with respect to constitution of the readiness portfolio, portfolio type, disbursement rates, processing times and implementation structures;
  • Review GCF processes and procedures for grants management and provide recommendations to improve efficiency and effectiveness and reduce risk;
  • Benchmark GCF grant management processes against peer organizations;
  • Identify successes and challenges, impacts on the beneficiaries, generate lessons learnt, specific recommendations for strengthening the implementation of the Readiness Programme as well as the implications for the design and planning stage.

 

Main outputs

  • Framework for aggregating the outputs of Readiness 1.0;
  • Assessment Report (Report on Readiness portfolio performance showing status and delivery trends, and Report on Program performance status and trends by type of Readiness support);
  • Recommendations Report including an action plan identifying key priorities and quick wins needed to address identified portfolio implementation and monitoring gaps and challenges;
  • Lessons Learned Report including case studies, best practices and lessons learnt based on assessment and review to date.

 

Others projects of potential interest

Mid Term Review of IUCN’s “Global Learning, Finance, and Partnerships Project under the Restoration Initiative (TRI)”

03/2022- 05/2022

Provision of Expert Services to the Secretariat for the Review and Assessment of the Readiness Programme Portfolio

12/2021 - 12/2022

Remediations to Address Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Gaps in the GCF Portfolio

12/2021 - 04/2022

Terminal Evaluation for the Good Growth Partnership (GGP) project “Taking deforestation out of the Commodity Supply Chain”

06/2021-12/2021

Costed Strategic Plan (2022-2026) for the Ministry of Natural Resources of Guyana

06/2021-03/2022

Comprehensive Gap Analysis, Stakeholder Engagement Plan and Capacity Development Plan

06/2021-04/2022

Midterm Evaluations (MTE) for two GEF-funded projects in Ecuador

04/2021 - 07/2021

Midterm Evaluation (MTE) for “A supply chain approach to eliminating mercury in Guyana’s ASGM sector: El Dorado Gold Jewelry – Made in Guyana”

12/2020 - 06/2021

Strategic Planning and Financial Analysis for the Implementation of the NDC of the LULUCF sector in Honduras

06/2020-07/2021

Consultancy Services for an Evidence Review on Private Sector Investments in Mitigation

06/2020-10/2021

Linkedin

Contact Us

Office

  • Plaza Independencia 808, Apt. 1001 11000 Montevideo, Uruguay

Indigenous peoples

Many of our projects in the different work areas include collaboration with Indigenous Peoples (IPs) or consideration of indigenous rights and interests. Our experience includes consultations, dialogues, workshops, training, all done both virtually due to the COVID situation or budget restrictions and on site. The on site experience in many cases involved communities in remote locations with complex access. In many cases the consultations, training or workshops required tailor made materials in local languages and tailor made dynamics. We have also worked as liaison between government institutions and IP communities or representatives reaching common understanding through consultations or documents. Throughout our work we have established a respectful and many times long term relationship with the IP representatives we have been involved with. Where no direct collaboration with IP communities is involved we are applying a human and indigenous rights based approach to our work. This includes to analyze, on a project by project basis, the risks a project could pose to IPs, the legal framework applicable to indigenous and vulnerable groups of actors, to identify legal gaps and develop mitigation measures that help ensure that indigenous rights and interest are fully taken on board during project implementation (see also “safeguards”).

Legal

A country’s legal framework provides key information on potential barriers to successful design and implementation of conservation activities, as well as of ways to promote an enabling environment. deep understanding of national and international legal frameworks is therefore key to ensure the sustainability and consistency of conservation projects and activities Our professional legal experts provide a thorough understanding of treaties, principles of international law, national and international legal cases, and integrate knowledge from other legal systems. They often work together with local lawyers, with the purpose of ensuring that national norms are adequately interpreted and considered. We have successfully supported national governments in designing national plans and strategies, particularly in the ambit of forest governance (REDD+) and climate change. In the development of participatory processes, we have provided legal advice to ensure that the procedures implemented are aligned with national and international legal requirements. We have provided legal advice with regards to social and environmental risks of policies and activities and the compliance with different social and environmental safeguards, including, e.g. those of the World Bank, UNDP and the Green Climate Fund (see also safeguards). We have also integrated legal perspectives when addressingWe have undertaken land tenure analysis at the national and local levels, with a view to achieving long-term success in sustainable forest management activities, as well as improved livelihoods. We have advised country governments on land and natural resources tenure, and on how to legally ensure the sustainability of implemented activities, and the well-being and respect of the rights of vulnerable actors, particularly indigenous and tribal peoples (see indigenous peoples). When required by country governments, we have supported processes of legal reform of laws and creation of institutions, providing concrete proposals on required legal adjustments. This has, for example, included the development of mechanisms for the response and resolution of complaints at the national level.

Protected areas

In an increasing number of AAE’s projects, protected areas play a role in one way or another. Protected areas are one of the main “tools” for conserving biodiversity and ecosystems around the world and play an important role in climate change mitigation and adaptation. By now, a number of different categories of protected areas are recognised, including areas largely closed off to people, but also those that are important because of existing interactions between people and nature or for their cultural values. Where AAE is involved in developing REDD+ strategies, we have assessed the potential role of a country’s protected areas under REDD+. Where a SESA or an ESIA gets conducted and an ESMP or ESMF developed, whether for REDD+ or any other conservation project, the effect of possible restrictions of access to land and resources in and around protected areas gets analyzed and mitigation measures identified to ensure that livelihoods will be at least maintained, if not improved over time. Several of AAE’s safeguards projects have a very direct link with protected areas since the application of safeguards can here be seen as a response to dealing with recurring topics of access restrictions, safety and security of local communities as well as park rangers and other human rights issues.

Gender

AAE develops initiatives and projects with a cross-cutting gender perspective through a wide range of services, such as gap analysis, design of gender-sensitive strategies, including REDD+ strategies, and Gender Action Plans and Frameworks (within Environmental and Social Safeguards Systems of different banks and institutions). This approach reflects the increasing relevance of gender mainstreaming in the international climate agenda. The use of tools and methodologies that allow for the incorporation of this approach is commonplace in all adaptation and mitigation initiatives in which AAE is involved, as well as in the design of specific actions, plans and frameworks to improve living conditions of the most vulnerable populations.

Gender mainstreaming into the project cycle is a key element for development banks and climate finance institutions. It is necessary to understand and react to the unequal consequences of climate change on women and men and to understand, recognize and have a critical eye on existing gender roles in the planning and execution of projects. Proper consideration of gender throughout the life cycle of projects not only ensures a more efficient intervention in climate change mitigation and adaptation projects, but also contributes towards gender equality. AAE works with these institutions in implementing solutions and responses from a rights-based approach that promote environmental, economic, social and developmental benefits from a gender equality perspective